I’ve got an odd relationship with downloading. I’m usually outspoken against it when discussing the subject with most of my friends, but usually for a variety of reasons that you really can’t articulate when these types of conversations boil down to lots of yelling. I’ll diffuse the normal “record labels and artists” and “pirating” and blah blah blah arguments that are usually the focus of the downloading conundrum for folks.
A big frustration for me with the design downloading is a certain culture that’s been generated because of its appeal. One would assume that, with millions and millions of songs and bands at one’s fingertips that one would relish the opportunity to listen to at no cost. In theory, it’s a great benefit for the consumer.
But really, from what I’ve witnessed, it (more often than not) creates a Consumer culture, with a big “C.” Considering the ease with which one can accumulate albums, the potential to seek out a hard-to-find gem in the same way that so many vinyl junkies can be whistfully nostalgic about is really gone. A few clicks of the mouse and it’s yours. And just about any other album you can think of.
So, instead of pouring over a piece of music, one can just accumulate a massive sonic library packed with things that they might never properly touch or listen to. The ability to say ‘I’ll download it” and not only not think twice, but not think about the album or song after the music is in your possession is increased tenfold.
How do I know this? Well, it could be from witnessing friends who ingest music without a thought (be it to the amount of time that was put into the piece of music or to the potential legal ramifications of their actions or merely stating the thought/sentence “I’ll just download it”) and, more often than not, usually let the music lay waste.
Or I could also know it from my own actions in the past. Not necessarily with illegal downloading of the sort: I maybe illegally downloaded a few dozen songs at the tail end of high school and promptly deleted most of those songs when I acquired the albums from other means. It’s more of my music acquisition in other areas. For example, I was a DJ at my college radio station for 4 years. During my shows, I’d pop a CD into the stereo system linked to the airwaves, eject it after it played, and then popped it into my computer. With literally thousands of CDs at my beckoning call, I could go on music binges, often uploading more songs than I could possibly listen to. I’d often try to, but I still come across the spare album I’ve rarely listened to (which makes for a fun listen in and of itself). (You could argue that, this action too, is just as illegal as downloading. But beyond my own arguments of merit, you have to take into account that most record companies realize that when they send music to a radio station – which are usually run by people who love music – people at radio stations are going to want what comes in the mail. Especially – gasp – college stations.)
At the same time, I also know I’m something of a music fanatic, and I take the time and energy to comb through blogs, newspapers, magazines, flyers, record stores, friends conversations, etc etc to find out about music. But my “Consumer kulture” really comes into play with a large majority of music listeners in the country. This mass is the same line of people who, decades before leading up to now (and even including the present), got their music listening “habits” from the major sources of music distribution, be it radio, television, newspapers, magazines. They listened to whatever landed on their grid, be it good, or bad (especially “or bad”). So now, today, when downloading – and illegal downloading – account for a majority of music consumption today, why is it that “bands” and “musical artists” such as, say, Nickelback (who I pick on a ton, but for good reason) continue to not only retain a large popularity of corporate radio/television while most critics and people who consider themselves to have musical taste largely detest the group? When Joel Tenenbaum‘s court case against the RIAA recently went to trial, were the illegal downloads in question the products of someone who poured through the dregs of the net in order to find these jewels? No. Nothing but Nirvana, Smashing Pumpkins, and other 90s alternative ephemera that, while good music, is the kind of collection that corporate radio has been surviving on since 1991 and Joel himself was reared on as a child. Most folks who are sued for illegally downloading tend to get caught for gathering some monolithic singles, which happen to be under the ownership of the big record companies in America. I would be hard pressed to see the RIAA hightailing it after some kid who illegally downloaded Black Flag’s My War and a couple of Jade Tree albums, though color me red if that indeed has happened. However, that would be the mark of someone who used downloading to seek out unfamiliar, unavailable, and unique musics and took the time and energy to do so. And that’s not the case that I see with a majority of people who download.
Of course, that is all a mass generalization, but sometimes generalizations are needed in order to gain a perspective on a certain culture…
Anyway, this brings me to a certain situation one of my downloading fiend friends was so quick to throw back in my face:
A handful of weeks ago, I discovered an excellent MediaFire folder through last.fm, and it is like discovering a holy grail of sorts. It’s officially called “Emo: 1985-1999,” though the url attachment is “emoisdead” (a query I’d argue against, but that’s another aside). Upon opening the link, I was blown away. 36 pages of 1st and 2nd wave emo acts. Many of them rarer than rare. Obscurer than the most obscure, out of print 7″ out there. For who knows how long I was so overwhelmed all I could do was click through the pages and stare in awe. There was some stuff I’d only heard whiffs of. And all on one site. And all for free.
As I said, I haven’t downloaded anything that hasn’t had the artists consent since the tail end of high school. I’ve got ye olde emusic account, I still buy CDs, I’ll grab stuff from blogs, and scour the net for musician-approved downloads. But, from all the huff and puff and ribbings I’d give friends who’d download a torrent without hesitation or afterthought and (sometimes) no interest in the artist, it would be an awful conundrum for me, especially when I’d discuss this. Because how could I not. This was a find!
Of course, it came back to hit me in the ass with one friend. And of course, whenever I’d provide some sort of insight into why I’d want to download some of this stuff or any claim I thought was legitimate, the potential for real discourse was closed. And I understand why, and I certainly deserved a good ribbing.
But, for me, there’s so much more than just Consumption. I’ve got an academic-strength interest in emo, and, after all, I’ve got America Is Just A Word in the works. And I believe I’ve still got them principles to back it up. There’s plenty of stuff on the mediafire site, and plenty I won’t download. There’s some stuff from Gravity Records or Dischord that I just won’t dare touch. The music is still in print, I can still purchase it. I know (and in some cases, have met and talk to) the artists and labels benefit from this, that there’s not some convoluted big-label hierarchy that most of my money would be going to, but the people who’s work I genuinely support. (Though I don’t necessarily have any qualms for/against major labels and taking money away from them… I don’t care for a lot that goes on in their system, but man, there are some great bands on major labels.)
But the other stuff on there? Some of that stuff just isn’t available anymore. And some stuff never was available.
Like Strictly Ballroom, which featured The Postal Service’s Jimmy Tamborello on bass. Their 1997 record Hide Here Forever came out on Waxploitation Records and is out of print and not even available on iTunes in the US (and only partially elsewhere). And it’s in the MediaFire emo folder.
Or Trocar, who’s Citywater album, which is apparently available on Self-Satisfied records, except for that any link to purchase the CD from the location on myspace in nearly impossible to get to without some anti-virus spyware popping up warning of various hazards, and they even say download it if you so feel like having it and give a link tooÂ (though it ain’t their preference). And it’s in the MediaFire emo folder.
Or The Promise Ring’s 3 track demo, a tape that was never meant to be created to be distributed for commercial sake. And it’s in the MediaFire emo folder.
Or Watercolour, a band I can’t track down for the life of me, and one which has no discernible song titles on their unreleased album, Stories About Old Rich White People, but it’s available on the emo-themed MediaFire site.
This is stuff for the superfans, the folks who seek out music, and it should be available for them. And because of downloading, it is. And whoever made the MediaFire emo folder isn’t the only one out there. A chunk of these hard-to-find bands are doing it themselves. Be it The Trigger Quintet posting all their songs for free download on last.fm, The Shyness Clinic letting folks download their entire discography off of Facebook, or James Joyce of Chocolate Kiss posting a link to download the band’s album Onethrutwelve on his blog with an accompanying history of the band and the story behind every song (complete with liner notes), it’s clear that these artists want their stuff out there… otherwise, why would they make and record their music in the first place?
I’m not necessarily defending myself… rather, I’m just happy I discovered this treasure, and am happy to continue to share it.
So, for those interested parties, here, once again is the link to one hellofa emo library:
Do whatever you will whenever you will.
Below are a handful of tracks I’ve enjoyed while combing through the massive list available. Enjoy:
The Trigger Quintet – “A Return Home”:
Strictly Ballroom – “Something That Just Is”:
Trocar – “Cathy – Little – Big – Man”:
Ordination of Aaron – “New Face”:
Roosevelts Inaugural Parade – “Darkened Sky”:
Watercolour – “Track 1”:
Chocolate Kiss – “Yellow Bear”:
Chune – “Water Sandwich”:
The Promise Ring – “12 Sweaters Red”:
what do you mean by “Iâ€™ll grab stuff from blogs”? are you referring to just individual tracks, e.g. promo samples from the labels?
I started out downloading free mp3s from the Epitaph website (over dial-up, they took at least 10-15 minutes each) and then buying the full CDs which I liked it. but now it just seems illogical to buy an album you haven’t heard already in full, given how accessible music is in both paid- and unpaid-for forms.
even though it’s free, downloading is still a market, and lowest-commonest dominator and name recognition still work. what I don’t like is that major-label stuff is usually easier to buy (distribution chains into high-street stores) and occasionally harder to grab (quickly taken down from blog links, etc., although it’s still there in the world of torrents) than more obscure stuff which I’d much rather contribute money towards.
By “I’ll grab stuff from blogs,” I mean usually just individual tracks, though some blogs/sites do have links to full free albums (such as Impose, who have a regular column entitled “Approved Theft” with legal free albums).
I did pretty much the same thing, scouring certain label sites. And I agree with you on the major label/obscure music as a market in the downloading realm… you’d think that, considering the accessibility and ease of downloading, and the preference that many have towards it (especially kids considering they’re practically reared on it these days), that the smaller labels would try and make their stuff more available for downloading. In some cases, they have (I’m thinking of Dischord, which has their own download webstore), though it’s hard for me to pinpoint where the problem lies considering I’m not on the business side of things. What are the cuts that one has to endure when selling music on, say, iTunes, especially when you’re a small label? And as far as the mass reliability of free downloads, what you’re saying, I think, really touches upon my “Consumer kulture” shtick: especially when you’re reliant on sharing music with others, you’ll find more people who consume the kind of stuff that’s on a major label because they don’t seek out stuff for themselves. So thank goodness for whoever set up the “Emo: 1985-1999” folder!
Luckily, there are more and more sites and programs like, say, Lala, which do allow you to listen to albums in full (and that site does have a pretty good mix of major label offerings and independent albums), and I too always prefer to take a listen before blindly jumping into things!
Downlo(d) Â« Perfect Lines | flux-rad.com
[…] LINK […]
trocar were from my city (kalamazoo) and i saw them 3-4 times between 1997 and 2000, they had a self titled “7 and a split with pinko besides that cd, they also broke up briefly in 1998 due to two members of the original lineup moving to LA to form the short lived band “sleet”. during this time the remaining members formed the band dynamic ribbon device and put out a cdep thats pretty much impossible to find now….saw them twice in 1998…….alot like trocar but more noisy and frantic from what i remember…..anyways trocar was reformed in late 1998 or thereabouts and “citywater” was recorded shortly therafter. that cd originally came out on littleman records which was their singer, chafe’s label (the trocar/pinko split, pinko “7 , fletcher “7 in ourselves/jihad split “7 and a few other records were released on that label between 1995-99) anyways, you should check out in ourselves, which was a pre trocar band who had a split with the rather well known kalamazoo hardcore band, jihad, its been so long since ive heard this record that i cant remember what it sounds like, but i do remember liking it……most of trocar has moved on to the band hornet, who in my opinion arent half as good as trocar was but pretty decent anyway.
i would say go to http://www.leonstemple.com they have a pretty decent trocar page there, however it seems to be down right now…..